11. References

Adler, P.S., and J. Birkhoff. 2000. "Twenty Things You Can Do To Help Environmental Stakeholder Groups Talk More Effectively About Science, Culture, Professional Knowledge, and Community Wisdom." Policy Consensus Center.

Adler, P.S., and J.L. Kranowitz. 2005. A Primer on Perceptions of Risk, Risk Communication and Building Trust. Keystone, CO: The Keystone Center. http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon_seq/refshelf/reg-issues/TKC%20Risk%20Paper.fin.pdf.

APHA (American Public Health Association). 2009. Expert Round Table on Social Media and Risk Communication During Times of Crisis: Strategic Challenges and Opportunities. Government-to-Citizen Communications: Utilising multiple digital channels effectively. [cited 1/2013]. directory.govloop.com/files/govloop/files/5.pdf‎.

ASTM (American Society of Testing and Materials). 2008a. "Standard Guide for Developing Conceptual Site Models for Contaminated Sites." E1689-95. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. www.astm.org.

ASTM. 2008b. "Standard Practice for Dealing With Outlying Observations." E178-08. Conshohocken, PA: ASTM. http://www.astm.org/Standards/E178.htm.

ASTM. 2010a. "Standard Guide for Risk-Based Corrective Action." E2081-00(2010)e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. www.astm.org.

ASTM. 2010b. "Standard Guide for Risk-Based Corrective Action Applied at Petroleum Release Sites." E1739-95(2010)e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. www.astm.org.

ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 1995. Toxicological Profile for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp69.pdf.

ATSDR. 2005. "Public Health Assessment Guidance Manual (Update)." Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/hac/PHAManual/PDFs/PHAGM_final1-27-05.pdf.

ATSDR. 2006. Toxicological Profile for Hydrogen Sulfide. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp.asp?id=389&tid=67.

ATSDR. 2012. "Public Sector Digital Communication Management Best Practices, Health Risk Communication Primer." Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/risk/riskprimer.

ATSDR. 2013. Minimal Risk Levels (MRL). http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/mrls/index.asp.

ATSDR. 2014. Toxicological Profiles. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/index.asp.

Bechtel Jacobs Company LLC. 1998. "Empirical Models for the Uptake of Inorganic Chemicals from Soil by Plants." BJC/OR-133. Oak Ridge, TN: Bechtel Jacobs Company LLC. http://rais.ornl.gov/documents/bjcor-133.pdf.

Boerngen, J.G., and H.T. Shacklette. 1981. "Chemical analysis of soils and other surficial materials of the conterminous United States." Open File Report 81-197: U.S. Geological Survey.

Bradford, G.R., A.C. Change, A.L. Page, D. Bakhtar, J.A. Frampton, and H. Wright. 1996. "Background Concentrations of Trace Metals and Major Elements in California Soils." Kearny Foundation of Soil Science, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California.

Burmaster, D.E. 2000. "Distributions of Total Job Tenure for Men and Women in Selected Industries and Occupations in the United States, February 1996." Risk Analysis no. 20 (April):205-224.

CalEPA (California Environmental Protection Agency). 2007. Development of Health Criteria for Schools Site Risk Assessment Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 901(g): Child-Specific Benchmark Change in Blood Lead Concentration for School Site Risk Assessment, Revised California Human Health Screening Levels for Lead. California Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Integrated Risk Assessment Branch. http://oehha.ca.gov/public_info/public/kids/schools041707.html.

CalEPA. 2009. Revised California Human Health Screening Levels for Lead. California Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Integrated Risk Assessment Branch. http://oehha.ca.gov/risk/pdf/LeadCHHSL091709.pdf.

CalEPA. 2011. Revised Toxicity Equivalency Factors for (TEFWHO-05) for PCDDs, PCDFs, and Dioxinlike PCBs. California Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Air Toxicology and Epidemiology. http://oehha.ca.gov/air/hot_spots/TEF013111.html.

CalEPA. 2013. Toxicity Criteria Database. California Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). http://www.oehha.ca.gov/tcdb/.

CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 2012a. CDC Response to Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Recommendations in “Low Level Lead Exposure Harms Children: A Renewed Call of Primary Prevention." Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/ACCLPP/CDC_Response_Lead_Exposure_Recs.pdf.

CDC. 2012b. "Low Level Lead Exposure Harms Children: A Renewed Call for Primary Prevention, Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention." Atlanta, GA. http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/acclpp/final_document_030712.pdf.

CDC. 2014. Conversion Calculator. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2004-101/calc.html.

Center for Risk Communication. 2013. http://www.centerforriskcommunication.org.

Commission, Presidential/Congressional. 1997a. "Framework for Environmental Health Risk Management. Final Report, Volume 1." Washington, D.C.: The Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management. http://www.riskworld.com/riskcommission/default.html.

Commission, Presidential/Congressional. 1997b. "Risk Assessment and Risk Management in Regulatory Decision‐Making. Final Report." Volume 2. Washington, D.C.: The Presidential Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management. http://www.riskworld.com/riskcommission/default.html.

Crumbling, D.M. 2002. "Search of Representativeness: Evolving the Environmental Data Quality Model." Quality Assurance no. 9:179-190.

Dragun, J., and K. Chekiri. 2005. Elements in North American Soils, Second Edition. Amherst, MA: Amherst Scientific Publishers.

DTSC (California Department of Toxic Substances Control). 1996. "Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance." Part A: Overview: California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/assessingrisk/eco2.cfm.

DTSC. 1997. "Selecting Inorganic Constituents as Chemicals of Potential Concern at Risk Assessments at Hazardous Waste Sites and Permitted Facilities. Final Policy." California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/AssessingRisk/upload/backgrnd.pdf.

DTSC. 2008. Proven Technologies and Remedies Guidance – Remediation of Metals in Soil. Sacramento, CA: California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/PublicationsForms/upload/Guidance_Remediation-Soils.pdf.

DTSC. 2009a. "Arsenic Strategies, Determination of Arsenic Remediation, Development of Arsenic Cleanup Goals." California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/AssessingRisk/upload/Arsenic-Cleanup-Goals-Jan09.pdf.

DTSC. 2009b. "Use of the Northern and Southern California Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) Studies in the Manufactured Gas Plant Site Cleanup Process." California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/AssessingRisk/upload/MGP_PAH_Advisory_070109.pdf.

DTSC. 2011a. LeadSpread 8 Model. California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/AssessingRisk/leadspread8.cfm.

DTSC. 2011b. "Final Guidance for the Evaluation and Mitigation of Subsurface Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air." Sacramento, CS: California Department of Toxic Substances Control. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/AssessingRisk/upload/Final_VIG_Oct_2011.pdf.

ECOS (Environmental Council of the States). 2007. "Identification and Selection of Toxicity Values/Criteria for CERCLA and Hazardous Waste Site Risk Assessments in the Absence of IRIS Values. Final." Washington, D.C.: The Environmental Council of the States. http://www.ecos.org/section/committees/cross_media/ecos_dod_sustainability_work_group/emerging_contaminants_task_group.

ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.). 2012. Create Thiessen Polygons (Analysis), Desktop 10, ArcGIS Resource Center. http://help.arcgis.com/en/arcgisdesktop/10.0/help/index.html#//00080000001m000000.

FAC (Florida Administrative Code). 2013. Contaminated Site Cleanup Criteria. 62-780. https://www.flrules.org/gateway/ChapterHome.asp?Chapter=62-780.

Gilbert, R.O. 1987. Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Gustavsson, N., B. Bølviken, D.B. Smith, and R.C. Severson. 2001. "Geochemical landscapes of the conterminous United States-New map presentations for 22 elements." Professional Paper 1648: U.S. Geological Survey. http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/2001/p1648/.

Hadley, P.W., and C.J. Newell. 2012. "Groundwater Remediation: The Next Thirty Years." Ground Water no. 50 (5):669-678.

Hartmann, H.M., J.P. Butler, A.M. Dorries, and J.R. Beck. 1993. "Use of the Exposure Unit Concept in Risk Assessments: A Case Study for Los Alamos National Laboratory." ANL/EA/CP-79756. Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Health Canada. 2010. "Federal Contaminated Site Risk Assessment in Canada, Part II: Health Canada Toxicological Reference Values (TRVs) and Chemical-Specific Factors." Version 2.0: Health Canada. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/contamsite/part-partie_ii/index-eng.php.

IEPA (Illinois Environmental Protection Agency). 2007. Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives (TACO). http://www.epa.state.il.us/land/taco/.

ITRC (Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council). 2003. Technical and Regulatory Guidance for the Triad Approach. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council. https://itrcweb.org/Guidance/GetDocument?documentID=90.

ITRC. 2005. Examination of Risk-Based Screening Values and Approaches of Selected States. RISK-1. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council. https://itrcweb.org/GuidanceDocuments/RISK-1.pdf.

ITRC. 2006. Planning and Promoting Ecological Land Reuse of Remediated Sites; Chapter 8 (Community Stakeholders). ECO-2. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Green and Ecological Land Reuse Team. https://itrcweb.org/Guidance/GetDocument?documentID=30.

ITRC. 2007a. Improving Environmental Site Remediation Through Performance-Based Environmental Management. RPO-7. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council. https://itrcweb.org/GuidanceDocuments/RPO-7.pdf.

ITRC. 2007b. Triad Implementation Guide. SCM-3. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council; Sampling, Characterization, and Monitoring Team. https://itrcweb.org/GuidanceDocuments/SCM-3.pdf.

ITRC. 2007c. Vapor Intrusion Pathway: A Practical Guideline. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Risk Assessment Resources Team. https://itrcweb.org/Documents/vi-1.pdf.

ITRC. 2007d. Vapor Intrusion Pathway: Investigative Approaches for Typical Scenarios. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Vapor Intrusion Team. https://itrcweb.org/GuidanceDocuments/VI-1A.pdf.

ITRC. 2008. Use of Risk Assessment in Management of Contaminated Sites. RISK-2. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council. Risk Assessment Resources Team. https://itrcweb.org/Guidance/GetDocument?documentID=77.

ITRC. 2011a. Green and Sustainable Remediation: A Practical Framework. GSR-2. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council. https://itrcweb.org/Guidance/ListDocuments?TopicID=9&SubTopicID=15.

ITRC. 2011b. Incorporating Bioavailability Considerations into the Evaluation of Contaminated Sediment Sites. CS-1. Washington D.C.: Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council. https://projects.itrcweb.org/contseds-bioavailability/.

ITRC. 2011c. Project Risk Management for Site Remediation. RRM-1. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council. https://itrcweb.org/Guidance/ListDocuments?TopicID=23&SubTopicID=32.

ITRC. 2012a. Incremental Sampling Methodology. ISM-1. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council. https://projects.itrcweb.org/ISM-1/Executive_Summary.html.

ITRC. 2012b. Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilities. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council. https://itrcweb.org/Membership/Member_FAQ.

ITRC. 2013. Groundwater Statistics and Monitoring Compliance, Statistical Tools for the Project Life Cycle. GSMC-1. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Groundwater Statistics and Monitoring Compliance Team. https://projects.itrcweb.org/gsmc-1/.

ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council). 2014. Petroleum Vapor Intrusion: Fundamentals of Screening, Investigation, and Management. PVI-1. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Team. www.itrcweb.org/PetroleumVI-Guidance.

Jenkins, T.F., A.D. Hewitt, M.E. Walsh, T.A. Ranney, C.A. Ramsey, C.L. Grant, and K.L. Bjella. 2005. "Representative Sampling for Energetic Compounds at Military Training Ranges." Environmental Forensics no. 6 (1):45-55.

Johnson, P.C., and R. A. Ettinger. 1991. "Heuristic model for predicting the intrusion rate of contaminant vapors into buildings." Environ Sci Technol no. 25 (8):1445-1452. doi: 10.1021/es00020a013.

Jury, W.A., W.F. Spencer, and W.J. Farmer. 1983. "Behavior Assessment Model for Trace Organics in Soil: I. Model Description." Journal of Environmental Quality no. 12 (4):448-464.

Kerr, M. 2006. Uniform Environmental Covenants Act. National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws.

Kresic, N., and A. Mikszewski. 2013. Hydrogeological Conceptual Site Models: Data Analysis and Visualization. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL.

MADEP (Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection). 2014. “Energy and Environmental Affairs Risk Assessment Web Site.” http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/toxics/sources/riskasmt-htm.html.

Maltoni, V. 2010. Applying Risk Communication Principles to Social Media Crisis. http://www.conversationagent.com/2010/08/applying-risk-communication-principles-to-social-media-crisis.html.

MDEQ (Michigan Department of Environmental Quality). 1998. "Environmental Response Division. Part 201, Generic Groundwater and Soil Volatilization to Indoor Air Inhalation Criteria." Technical Support Document. August 31.

MDEQ. 2005. Michigan Background Soil Survey. Hazardous Waste Technical Support Unit, Hazardous Waste Section, Waste and Hazardous Materials Division. http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/deq-whm-hwp-Michigan-Background-Soil-revJuly2005_248097_7.pdf.

MPCA (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency). 2014. “Air Emissions Risk Analysis Web Site.” http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/air/air-monitoring-and-reporting/air-emissions-modeling-and-monitoring/air-emission-risk-analysis-aera/air-emissions-risk-analysis-aera.html.

NCEA. 2009. "NCEA Policy and Procedures for Conducting IRIS Peer Reviews." United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www2.epa.gov/iris/ncea-2009-policy-and-procedures-conducting-iris-peer-reviews.

Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. 2013. Maximum Permissible Risk. Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport. http://www.rivm.nl/English.

NIH (National Institutes of Health) 2010. Introduction to Toxicology and Dose-Response. http://toxlearn.nlm.nih.gov/htmlversion/module1.html.

NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). 2014. NIST/EPA/NIH Mass Spectral Library with Search Program. Standard Reference Data. http://www.nist.gov/srd/nist1a.cfm.

NIST/SEMATECH. 2012. "e-Handbook of Statistical Methods." http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/.

NJDEP (New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection). 2004. "Rinsate Blank Contamination Assessment." http://www.state.nj.us/drbc/library/documents/PCB-Rinsate.pdf.

NJDEP. 2008. Inhalation Exposure Pathway Soil Remediation Standards: Basis and Background. Site Remediation Program, NJDEP. http://www.state.nj.us/dep/srp/regs/rs/bb_inhalation.pdf.

NJDEP. 2012a. Brownfield and Contaminated Site Remediation Act, N.J.S.A. 58:10B-1 et seq. http://www.nj.gov/dep/srp/regs/statutes/bcsra.pdf.

NJDEP. 2012b. "Technical Guidance for the Attainment of Remediation Standards and Site-Specific Criteria." New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Site Remediation Program. http://www.state.nj.us/dep/srp/guidance/srra/attainment_compliance.pdf.

NJDEP. 2013. "Instructions for New Jersey Johnson & Ettinger Spreadsheets, NJ-GW-SCREEN and NJ-GW-ADV." New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Site Remediation Program. http://www.state.nj.us/dep/srp/guidance/vaporintrusion/njje.htm.

NOAA. 2010. "Comparative Climatic Data for the United States Through 2010." National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

NRC (National Research Council). 1983. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process (Red Book). Washington, D.C.: National Research Council Committee on the Institutional Means for Assessment of Risks to Public Health, Commission on Life Sciences.

NRC. 1989. "Improving Risk Communication." Washington, D.C.: National Research Council, Committee on Risk Perception, National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=1189.

NRC. 2009. "Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment." Committee on Improving Risk Analysis Approaches used by the USEPA. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12209.

NRC. 2011. "Sustainability and the U.S. EPA (Green Book)." Washington, D.C.: National Research Council, Committee on Incorporating Sustainability in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Science and Technology for Sustainability Program Policy and Global Affairs Program, National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13152.

NRC. 2013. "Alternatives for Managing the Nation’s Complex Contaminated Groundwater Sites." Washington, D.C.: National Research Council, Committee on Future Options for Management in the Nation’s Subsurface Remediation Effort, Water Science and Technology Board, National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/14668/alternatives-for-managing-the-nations-complex-contaminated-groundwater-sites.

NRC. 2014. "Best Practices for Risk-Informed Decision Making Regarding Contaminated Sites." In Summary of a Workshop Series. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council Committee on Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure and Post-Closure of Contaminated Sites. www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=18747.

NYDEC (New York Department of Environmental Conservation). 2014. "Soil Cleanup Objectives." http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/34189.html.

Oberg, T., and B. Bergback, eds. 2013. A Review Article of Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Contaminated Land. Kalmar, Sweden: University of Kalmar, Department of Biology and Environmental Science.

ORNL (Oak Ridge National Laboratory). 2014. Risk Assessment Information System. http://rais.ornl.gov/.

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. 2012. Visual Sample Plan. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. http://vsp.pnnl.gov.

Pedersen, T.A., and J.M. LaVelle. 1997. Soil Contaminant and Exposure Point Concentration Computation Using Voronoi Tessellation and Weighted Averaging. http://info.ngwa.org/gwol/pdf/972963322.PDF.

Pennsylvania Revised Code. 2011. Sources of Toxicity Information, Subchapter F. Exposure and Risk Determinations, 250.605. http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/025/chapter250/subchapFtoc.html.

Peters, R.G., V.T. Covello, and D.B. McCallum. 1997. "The Determinants of Trust and Credibility in Environmental Risk Communication: An Empirical Study." Risk Analysis no. 17:43-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.

PLAIN (Plain Language Action and Information Network). 2011. "Federal Plain Language Guidelines." http://www.plainlanguage.gov/howto/guidelines/FederalPLGuidelines/.

Ramsey, C.A., and A.D. Hewitt. 2005. "A Methodology for Assessing Sample Representativeness." Environmental Forensics no. 6 (1):71-75.

Reynolds, S.D., P.W. Hadley, and Sedman R.M. 1990. "A Health-Based Approach for Evaluating Soil at Depth Contaminated by Hazardous Waste: Utilizing the AAL Soil Contact Criterion." Risk Analysis no. 10 (4):571-574.

Sedman, R.M., S.D. Reynolds, and P.W. Hadley. 1992. "Why Did You Take That Sample?" Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association no. 42 (11):1420-1423.

Shacklette, H.T., and J.G. Boerngen. 1984. "Element concentrations in soils and other surficial materials of the conterminous United States." Professional Paper 1270: US Geological Survey. http://minerals.usgs.gov/news/newsletter/v2n1/2geochem.html.

Solt, M.J. 2010. Multivariate Analysis of Lead in Urban Soil in Sacramento, CA, California State University, Sacramento.

Stanek, E.J., E.J. Calabrese, R. Barnes, and P. Pekow. 1997. "Soil Ingestion in Adults—Results of a Second Pilot Study." Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety no. 36 (3):249-257.

TCEQ (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality). 2014. TCEQ Guidelines to Develop Toxicity Factors. http://www.tceq.texas.gov/toxicology/esl/guidelines/about.html.

USACE (United States Army Corps of Engineers). 1998. Environmental Quality, Technical Project Planning (TPP) Process. EM 200-1-2. Washington, D.C.: Department of the Army. http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_200-1-2.pdf.

USACE. 1999. Risk Assessment Handbook Volume I: Human Health Evaluation. 20314-1000, EM 200-1-4. Washington, D.C.: Department of the Army. http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_200-1-4_Vol-01.pdf.

USACE. 2009. Adaptive Risk Assessment Modeling System (ARAMS). http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/arams/.

USACE. 2012. Conceptual Site Models. EM 200-1-12. Washington, D.C.: Department of the Army. http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_200-1-12.pdf.

USACE. 2013. Environmental Statistics. EM 200-1-16. Washington, D.C.: Department of the Army. http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_200-1-16.pdf.

USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). 2014. Dietary Reference Intake Tables. http://fnic.nal.usda.gov/dietary-guidance/dietary-reference-intakes/dri-tables.

USDOD (United States Department of Defense). 2013. Quality Systems Manual (QSM) for Environmental Laboratories, Version 5: Department of Defense Environmental Data Quality Workgroup (EDQW).

USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1984. Survey Management Handbook, Volume II: Overseeing the Technical Progress of a Survey Contract. EPA 230/12-84-002. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6857.

USEPA. 1986. Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment. EPA/630/R-00/004. September 24, 1986, Federal Register 51(185):33992-34003. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6887.

USEPA. 1988a. Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA. EPA/540/G-89/004, OSWER # 9355.3-01. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. http://rais.ornl.gov/documents/GUIDANCE.PDF.

USEPA. 1988b. Seven Cardinal Rules of Risk Communication. OPA-87-020. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6889.

USEPA. 1989a. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), (Part A) Volume I, Human Health Evaluation Manual. EPA/540/1-89/002. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. http://www2.epa.gov/risk/risk-assessment-guidance-superfund-rags-part.

USEPA. 1989b. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume 2: Environmental Evaluation Manual. EPA 540/1-89/001. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. http://rais.ornl.gov/documents/RASUPEV.pdf.

USEPA. 1991a. ECO Update: Ecological Assessment of Superfund Sites: An Overview. EPA 9345.0-51. Washington, D.C. http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/v1no2.pdf.

USEPA. 1991b. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS) Development of Risk-Based Preliminary Remediation Goals, Volume I, Human Health Evaluation Manual, (Part B). EPA/540/R-92/003. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www2.epa.gov/risk/risk-assessment-guidance-superfund-rags-part-b.

USEPA. 1991c. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS) (Part C) Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives, Volume I, Human Health Evaluation Manual. EPA/540/-189/002. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www2.epa.gov/risk/risk-assessment-guidance-superfund-rags-part-c.

USEPA. 1991d. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual, Supplemental Guidance, Standard Default Exposure Factors. Interim Final. OSWER Directive 9285.6-03. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Toxics Integration Branch. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6890.

USEPA. 1991e. Role of the Baseline Risk Assessment in Superfund Remedy Selection Decisions. OSWER Directive 9355.0-30. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6914.

USEPA. 1992b. Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA /630 /R-92/001. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www2.epa.gov/risk/framework-ecological-risk-assessment.

USEPA. 1992c. Guidelines for Exposure Assessment. EPA/600/Z-92/001. Washington, D.C.: United States. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum. http://www2.epa.gov/risk/guidelines-exposure-assessment.

USEPA. 1992d. Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculating the Concentration Term. Publication 9285.7-081. Washington, D.C.: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6888.

USEPA 1993a. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), Arsenic, inorganic (CASRN 7440-38-2). United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris2/chemicalLanding.cfm?substance_nmbr=278.

USEPA, ed. 1993b. Provisional Guidance for Quantitative Risk Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. EPA/600/R-93/089. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6886.

USEPA. 1993c. Reference Dose (RfD): Description and Use in Health Risk Assessments, Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www2.epa.gov/iris/reference-dose-rfd-description-and-use-health-risk-assessments.

USEPA. 1994a. Guidance Manual for the Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model for Lead in Children. Publication Number 9285.7-15-1, EPA/540/R-93/081, PB93-963510: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6856.

USEPA. 1994b. Methods for Derivation of Inhalation Reference Concentrations (RfCs) and Application of Inhalation Dosimetry. EPA/600/8-90/066F. Research Triangle Park, NC: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?PrintVersion=True&deid=71993#Download.

USEPA. 1995a. Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study Series, Guidelines for Predictive Baseline Emissions Estimation Procedures for Superfund Sites. EPA-451/R-96-001. Research Triangle Park, N.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.

USEPA. 1995b. Elements to Consider When Drafting EPA Risk Characterizations. Washington, D.C. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6871.

USEPA. 1995c. Guidance for Risk Characterization. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Science and Policy Council. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6870.

USEPA. 1995e.Land Use in the CERCLA Remedy Selection Process. United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www2.epa.gov/fedfac/land-use-cercla-remedy-selection-process.

USEPA. 1996a. PCBs: Cancer Dose-Response Assessment and Application to Environmental Mixtures. EPA/600/P-96/001F: National Center for Environmental Assessment. Office of Research and Development. http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris_drafts/recordisplay.cfm?deid=12486.

USEPA. 1996b. USEPA Soil Screening Level (SSL) Guidance Document: Technical Background Document, 2nd Edition. EPA/540/R95/128. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. http://www2.epa.gov/superfund/soil-screening-guidance.

USEPA. 1996c. USEPA Soil Screening Level (SSL) Guidance Document: Users Guide. Second Edition. Publication 9355.4-23. Washington, D.C: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. http://www2.epa.gov/superfund/soil-screening-guidance

USEPA. 1997a. Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Process for Designing and Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments - Interim Final. EPA 540/R-97/006. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www2.epa.gov/risk/ecological-risk-assessment-guidance-superfund-process-designing-and-conducting-ecological-risk .

USEPA. 1997b. Exposure Factors Handbook (1997 Final Report). EPA/600/P-95/002F. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment. http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=12464.

USEPA. 1997c. Guiding Principles for Monte Carlo Analysis. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency.

USEPA. 1997d. Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST). http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=2877.

USEPA. 1997e. "Policy for Use of Probabilistic Analysis in Risk Assessment at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency." Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency.

USEPA. 1997f. Rules of Thumb for Superfund Remedy Selection. EPA/600/P-95/002F. Washington D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6915.

USEPA. 1998. Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA 630/R-95/002F. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Regulatory Agency. http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-11/documents/eco_risk_assessment1998.pdf.

USEPA. 1998b. Land Use in the CERCLA Remedy Selection Process. United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/community/relocation/landuse.htm

USEPA. 2000a. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), Benzene (CASRN 71-43-2). http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris2/chemicalLanding.cfm?substance_nmbr=276.

USEPA. 2000b. Risk Characterization Handbook. EPA 100/B-00/002. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Science and Policy, Office of Research and Development. http://www2.epa.gov/risk/risk-characterization-handbook.

USEPA. 2000c. Supplementary Guidance for Conducting Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures. EPA/630/R-00/002. Washington, D.C.: Risk Assessment Forum Technical Panel. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6855.

USEPA. 2001a. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), Chloroform (CASRN 67-66-3). http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris2/chemicalLanding.cfm?substance_nmbr=25.

USEPA. 2001b. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), (Part D), Standardized Planning, Reporting, and Review of Superfund Risk Assessments. Volume I, Human Health Evaluation Manual, 9285.7-47. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. http://www2.epa.gov/risk/risk-assessment-guidance-superfund-rags-part-d.

USEPA. 2001c. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), Volume III, Part A: Process for Conducting Probabilistic Risk Assessment. EPA 540/R-02/002. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6872.

USEPA. 2001d. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume I - Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part D, Standardized Planning, Reporting, and Review of Superfund Risk Assessments) . OSWER Directive 9285.7-01D. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency.

USEPA. 2002a. Calculating Upper Confidence Limits for Exposure Point Concentrations at Hazardous Waste Sites. OSWER 9285.6-10. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6873.

USEPA. 2002b. EMSOFT User's Guide and Modeling Software (2002 Update), NCEA/W-0073. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.

USEPA. 2002c. Guidance for Comparing Background and Chemical Concentrations in Soil for CERCLA Sites. EPA 540-R-01-003, OSWER 9285.7-41. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6874.

USEPA. 2002d. A Review of the Reference Dose and Reference Concentration Processes. EPA/630/P-02/002F. http://www2.epa.gov/osa/review-reference-dose-and-reference-concentration-processes.

USEPA. 2002e. "Role of Background in the CERCLA Cleanup Program." OSWER 9285.6-07P. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6875.

USEPA. 2002f. Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites. OSWER Directive 9355.4-24. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. http://pubweb.epa.gov/superfund/health/conmedia/soil/pdfs/ssg_main.pdf.

USEPA. 2003a. Adult Lead Methodology (ALM) Model Software and Users’ Manuals, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. EPA-540-R-03-001, OSWER #9285.7-54. Washington D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://pubweb.epa.gov/superfund/health/contaminants/lead/products/adultpb.pdf.

USEPA. 2003b. Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposures at Lead Sites. EPA-540-R-03-008, OSWER # 9285.7-76. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6876.

USEPA. 2003c. Framework for Cumulative Risk Assessment. EPA/630/P-02/001F. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Risk Assessment Forum. http://www2.epa.gov/risk/framework-cumulative-risk-assessment.

USEPA. 2003d. "Memorandum - Human Health Toxicity Values in Superfund Risk Assessments." OSWER # 9285.7-53. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6877.

USEPA. 2003e. Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead in Soil. EPA-540-R-03-001. Washington, D.C.: Technical Review Workgroup for Lead, United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6878.

USEPA. 2003f. Using the Triad Approach to Streamline Brownfields Site Assessment and Cleanup. Brownfields Technology Primer Series: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Brownfields Technology Support Center. http://www2.epa.gov/remedytech/using-triad-approach-streamline-brownfields-site-assessment-and-cleanup.

USEPA. 2004a. An Examination of EPA Risk Assessment Principles and Practices. EPA/100/B-04/001. Washington D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Science Advisor Staff Paper. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6879.

USEPA. 2004b. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS) Volume 1, Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part E), Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment. EPA 540/R/99/005. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www2.epa.gov/risk/risk-assessment-guidance-superfund-rags-part-e.

USEPA. 2004c. User's Guide for Evaluating Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/2004_0222_3phase_users_guide.pdf.

USEPA. 2005a. All-Ages Lead Model (AALM) Version 1.05 (External Draft Report). United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=139314.

USEPA. 2005b. Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment. EPA/630/P-03/001F. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum. http://www2.epa.gov/risk/guidelines-carcinogen-risk-assessment.

USEPA. 2005c. Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol for Hazardous Waste Combustion Facilities. EPA520-R-05-006. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. http://www3.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/tsd/td/combust/risk.htm#hhrad.

USEPA. 2005d. Supplemental Guidance for Assessing Susceptibility from Early-Life Exposure to Carcinogens. EPA/630/R-30/003F. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum. http://www2.epa.gov/risk/supplemental-guidance-assessing-susceptibility-early-life-exposure-carcinogens.

USEPA. 2006a. "Cumulative Risk from Chloroacetanilide Pesticides." Office of Pesticide Programs. Health Effects Division.

USEPA. 2006b. Data Quality Assessment: Statistical Methods for Practitioners. EPA QA/G-9S; EPA/240/B-06/003. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www2.epa.gov/quality/guidance-data-quality-assessment.

USEPA. 2006c. Guidance on Systematic Planning Using the Data Quality Objectives Process. EPA QA/G-4; EPA/240/B-06/001. Washington D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www2.epa.gov/quality/guidance-systematic-planning-using-data-quality-objectives-process-epa-qag-4.

USEPA. 2006d. "Organophosphorus Cumulative Risk Assessment – 2006 Update." Office of Pesticide Programs. United States Environmental Protection Agency.

USEPA. 2006f. Region 3 Quality Assurance Team, TICs, Frequently Asked Questions. http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/tics.pdf.

USEPA. 2006g. "Triazine Cumulative Risk Assessment." Office of Pesticide Programs. Health Effects Division. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6880.

USEPA. 2007a. Estimation of Relative Bioavailability of Lead in Soil and Soil-Like Materials Using in Vivo and in Vitro Methods. OSWER #9285.7-77. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6916.

USEPA. 2007b. Framework for Determining a Mutagenic Mode of Action for Carcinogenicity, Risk Assessment Forum Technical Panel on Mutagenic Mode of Action. EPA 120/R-07/002-A, External Peer Review Draft. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6881.

USEPA. 2007c. Guidance for Evaluating the Oral Bioavailability of Metals in Soils for Use in Human Health Risk Assessment. OSWER #9285.7-80. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6882

USEPA. 2007d. "Revised N-Methyl Carbamate Cumulative Risk Assessment." Office of Pesticide Programs. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6883.

USEPA. 2007e. Risk Communication in Action, the Risk Communication Handbook. EPA 625/R-05/003. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory. http://nepis.epa.gov/Adobe/PDF/60000I2U.pdf.

USEPA. 2007f. System Requirements and Design for the Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model for Lead in Children (IEUBK) Windows®. EPA 9285.7-42, 540-K-01-005. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. http://www2.epa.gov/superfund/lead-superfund-sites-software-and-users-manuals#system.

USEPA. 2007g. Effective Risk and Crisis Communication During Water Security Emergencies. EPA/600/R-07/027. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6884.

USEPA. 2008a. Resources for Planning New Data Collection, EPA Quality System. http://www2.epa.gov/quality/resources-planning-new-data-collections.

USEPA. 2008b. USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Superfund Organic Methods Data Review. EPA-540-R-08-01. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. http://www2.epa.gov/clp/contract-laboratory-program-national-functional-guidelines-data-review.

USEPA. 2009a. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS) Volume 1, Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part F), Supplemental Guidance for Inhalation Risk Assessment. EPA/540/R-070/002. Washington, D.C. http://www2.epa.gov/risk/risk-assessment-guidance-superfund-rags-part-f.

USEPA. 2009b. Statistical Analysis of Groundwater Monitoring Data at RCRA Facilities: Unified Guidance. EPA 530/R-09-007. Washington DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www3.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/correctiveaction/resources/guidance/sitechar/gwstats/unified-guid.pdf.

USEPA. 2009c. Update of the Adult Lead Methodology’s Default Baseline Blood Lead Concentration and Geometric Standard Deviation Parameters. OSWER #9200.2-82. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. http://pubweb.epa.gov/superfund/health/contaminants/lead/products/almupdate.pdf.

USEPA. 2009d. Validation Assessment of In Vitro Lead Bioaccessibility Assay for Predicting Relative Bioavailability of Lead in Soils and Soil-like Materials at Superfund Sites. OSWER 9200.3-51. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://itrcweb.org/FileCabinet/GetFile?fileID=6917.

USEPA. 2010a. Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model (IEUBKwin v1.1 build 11), Software and Users’ Manuals. Washington, D.C. http://www2.epa.gov/superfund/lead-superfund-sites-software-and-users-manuals.

USEPA. 2010b. "Overview of IRIS Human Health Effect Reference and Risk Values." Reading Packet HBA 202. Basics of Human Health Risk Assessment (HBA) Course Series. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency.

USEPA. 2010c. ProUCL Version 4.1.00 Technical Guide (Draft). EPA/600/R-07/041. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-03/documents/proucl_v4.1_tech.pdf.

USEPA. 2010d. Recommended Toxicity Equivalence Factors (TEFs) for Human Health Risk Assessments of 3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and Dioxin-Like Compounds. EPA/100/R 10/005. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the Science Advisor, Risk Assessment Forum. http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2013-09/documents/tefs-for-dioxin-epa-00-r-10-005-final.pdf.

USEPA. 2010e. USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Superfund Data Review. EPA 540-R-10-011. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. http://www2.epa.gov/clp/usepa-contract-laboratory-program-national-functional-guidelines-inorganic-superfund-data-review.

USEPA. 2011a. AERSCREEN Model, EPA-454/B-11-001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division, Air Quality Modeling Group, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

USEPA. 2011b. Background Indoor Air Concentrations Volatile Organic Compounds in North American Residences (1990-2005): A Compilation of Statistics for Assessing Vapor Intrusion. EPA 530-R-10-001. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

USEPA. 2011c. Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition. EPA/600/R-09/052F. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment. http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/risk/recordisplay.cfm?deid=236252.

USEPA. 2011d. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), Trichloroethylene (CASRN 79-01-6). United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris2/chemicalLanding.cfm?substance_nmbr=199.

USEPA. 2011e. "Pyrethrins/Pyrethroid Cumulative Risk Assessment." Office of Pesticide Programs. http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0746-0003.

USEPA. 2011g. Toxicological Review of Trichloroethylene. EPA/635/R-09/011F. http://www2.epa.gov/iris/supporting-documents-trichloroethylene.

USEPA. 2011h. USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Chlorinated Dioxin/Furan Data Review. EPA-540-R-11-016. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. http://www2.epa.gov/clp/usepa-contract-laboratory-program-national-functional-guidelines-chlorinated-dioxinfuran-data.

USEPA. 2012a. EPI Suite. Estimation Program Interface (EPI) Suite Version 4.11 United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www2.epa.gov/tsca-screening-tools/epi-suitetm-estimation-program-interface.

USEPA. 2012b. Handbook for Implementing the Supplemental Cancer Guidance at Waste and Cleanup Sites. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency.

USEPA. 2012c. Human Health Risk Assessment (Web Page), Science and Technology, EPA Risk Assessment. United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www2.epa.gov/risk/human-health-risk-assessment.

USEPA. 2012d. Institutional Controls: A Guide to Planning, Implementing, Maintaining, and Enforcing Institutional Controls at Contaminated Sites. EPA/540/R-09/001. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/final_pime_guidance_december_2012.pdf.

USEPA. 2012g. "Provisional Peer-Reviewed Toxicity Values for Thallium and Compounds (VARIOUS CASRN). Final." Superfund Health Risk Technical Support Center. National Center for Environmental Assessment. Office of Research and Development. United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://hhpprtv.ornl.gov/issue_papers/ThalliumSolubleSalts.pdf.

USEPA. 2012h. "Recommendations for Default Value for Relative Bioavailability of Arsenic in Soil." OSWER #9200.1-113. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. http://semspub.epa.gov/work/11/175338.pdf.

USEPA. 2012i. Vapor Intrusion Database: Evaluation and Characterization of Attenuation Factors for Chlorinated Volatile Organic Compounds and Residential Buildings. https://iavi.rti.org.

USEPA. 2013a. Chemicals with Mutagenic Mode of Action (MOA) for Carcinogenesis, Handbook for Implementing the Supplemental Cancer Guidance at Waste and Cleanup Sites. Washington, D.C.

USEPA. 2013d. Pro-UCL Software. http://www2.epa.gov/land-research/proucl-software.

USEPA. 2013e. ProUCL Software Documentation. United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www2.epa.gov/land-research/proucl-software.

USEPA. 2013f. Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values for Superfund (PPRTV). United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, Waste and Cleanup Risk Assessment. http://hhpprtv.ornl.gov/.

USEPA. 2013g. Quality Management Tools - Data Quality Assessment. http://www2.epa.gov/quality/epa-quality-management-tools-projects#dq.

USEPA. 2013h. Technical Support and Resource Centers. http://www2.epa.gov/land-research/technical-support-centers.

USEPA. 2014a. Child-Specific Exposure Scenario Examples. EPA/600/R-14/217-F. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/risk/recordisplay.cfm?deid=262211.

USEPA. 2014b. "Determining Groundwater Exposure Point Concentrations, Supplemental Guidance." OSWER Directive 9283.1-42. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency.

USEPA. 2014c. Drinking Water Standards. http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/.

USEPA. 2014d. EPA-Expo-Box Glossary. http://www2.epa.gov/expobox/basic-information-about-epa-expo-box.

USEPA. 2014e. USEPA Regional Screening Levels (RSL) User's Guide (November 2014) and Generic Tables. http://www2.epa.gov/risk/regional-screening-table-users-guide-june-2015.

USEPA. 2014f. Framework for Human Health Risk Assessment to Inform Decision Making. EPA/100/R-14/001. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www2.epa.gov/risk/framework-human-health-risk-assessment-inform-decision-making.

USEPA. 2014h. "Human Health Evaluation Manual, Supplemental Guidance: Update of Standard Default Exposure Factors." OSWER Directive 9200.1-120. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-11/documents/oswer_directive_9200.1-120_exposurefactors_corrected2.pdf.

USEPA. 2014i. Preliminary Remediation Goals for Radionuclides. http://epa-prgs.ornl.gov/radionuclides/.

USEPA. 2014j. Probabilistic Risk Assessment to Inform Decision Making: Frequently Asked Questions. EPA/100/R-14/003. Washington D.C. http://www2.epa.gov/osa/probabilistic-risk-assessment-inform-decision-making-frequently-asked-questions.

USEPA. 2014k. Regional Removal Management Levels for Chemicals. http://www2.epa.gov/risk/regional-removal-management-levels-chemicals-rmls.

USEPA. 2014l. Risk Assessment Forum While Paper: Probabilistic Risk Assessment Methods and Case Studies. EPA/100/R-14/004. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-12/documents/raf-pra-white-paper-final.pdf

USEPA 2015. Exposure Assessment Tools by Routes - Dermal. http://www2.epa.gov/expobox/exposure-assessment-tools-routes-dermal.

USEPA. 2015b. Peer Review Handbook, 4th Edition. EPA/100/B-15/001. Washington, D.C.: United States Environmental Protection Agency Science Policy Council. http://www2.epa.gov/osa/peer-review-handbook-4th-edition-2015

USEPA. 2015c. EPA Quality Management Tools for Projects - Verification and Validation. http://www2.epa.gov/quality/epa-quality-management-tools-projects#vv.

USEPA 2015d. EPA Superfund Program: Love Canal. Niagara Falls, NY. http://cumulis.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0201290.

USEPA. 2015e. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www2.epa.gov/iris.

USEPA. 2015f. Lead at Superfund Sites. Risk Assessment. http://www2.epa.gov/superfund/lead-superfund-sites-risk-assessment.

USEPA. 2015g. Lead at Superfund Sites: Frequent Questions from Risk Assessors on the Adult Lead Methodology. United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www2.epa.gov/superfund/lead-superfund-sites-frequent-questions-risk-assessors-adult-lead-methodology

USEPA. 2015h.EPA Terminology Services. Search. Terms and Acronyms Web Page. http://iaspub.epa.gov/sor_internet/registry/termreg/searchandretrieve/termsandacronyms/search.do.

USGS (United States Geological Survey). 2012. "Minerals On-Line Spatial Data." U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey. http://tin.er.usgs.gov/geochem/doc/averages/countydata.htm.

U.S. Navy (United States Navy). 2008. Human Health Risk Assessment Guidance. Prepared for Naval Facilities Engineering Command and Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center by Pioneer Technologies Corporation, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center. http://www.med.navy.mil/sites/nmcphc/Documents/environmental-programs/risk-assessment/Chapters_1-12.pdf.

U.S. Navy. 2014a. Conceptual Site Model Tool. http://www.navfac.navy.mil/navfac_worldwide/specialty_centers/exwc/products_and_services/ev/erb/tech/t2.html#t2_tools.

U.S. Navy. 2014b. Optimization Roadmap. Navy Facilities Command (NAVFAC). http://www.navfac.navy.mil/navfac_worldwide/specialty_centers/exwc/products_and_services/ev/erb/opt.html.

University of Florida, Center for Environmental & Human Toxicology. 2005. Technical Report: Development of Cleanup Target Levels for Chapter 62-777, F.A.C. Gainesville, FL.

University of Tennessee. 2013. Spatial Analysis and Decision Assistance (SADA). The Institute for Environmental Modeling, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee. http://www.sadaproject.net.

Van den Berg, M., L. Birnbaum, M. Denison, M. De Vito, W. Farland, M. Feeley, H. Fiedler, H. Hakansson, A. Hanberg, L. Haws, M. Rose, S. Safe, D. Schrenk, C. Tohyama, A. Tritscher, J. Tuomisto, M. Tysklind, N. Walker, and R.E. Peterson. 2006. "The 2005 World Health Organization Re-evaluation of Human and Mammalian Toxic Equivalency Factors for Dioxins and Dioxin-Like Compounds." Toxicological Sciences 93:223-241: The World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/foodsafety/chem/tef_update/en/index.html.

World Health Organization (WHO). 2013. Concise International Chemical Assessment Documents, International Programme on Chemical Safety. http://www.who.int/ipcs/publications/cicad/en/.

Publication Date: January 2015

Permission is granted to refer to or quote from this publication with the customary acknowledgment of the source (see suggested citation and disclaimer).